Figure 11. Numerical simulation of the propagation of elastic waves, using the finite volume method in a Cartesian grid. In the left hand side, the grid is regular and, then, the method is equivalent to the finite difference method. In the right hand side the grid has been randomly perturbed except a rank of cells on the border. The top of the figure shows a detail of the grids (the full grid has 256x256 points). The middle and bottom of the figure show two snapshots of the simulation at two different time steps(the boundary conditions being periodical, two periods are shown per each dimension). The variable represented is the trace of the strain tensor epsilon_ii. The color code used has been chosen to emphasize small values, in order to clearly display the numerical artifacts. It is interesting to note that, even for strongly perturbed grids, the numerical artifacts are surprisingly small.
Figure 12. Numerical simulation of the propagation of elastic waves, using the finite volume method in a minimal grid. In the left hand side, the grid is regular and, then, the method is equivalent to the finite difference method in a minimal grid. In the right hand side the grid has been randomly perturbed except a rank of cells on the border. The top of the figure shows a detail of the grids (the full grid has 512x512 points). The middle and bottom of the figure show two snapshots of the simulation at two different time steps. The top is a free surface (Neumann type), while the bottom and the sides are rigid (Dirichlet type). The variable represented is the trace of the strain tensor epsilon_ii. The color code used has been chosen to emphasize small values, in order to clearly display the numerical artifacts. Even for strongly perturbed grids, the numerical artifacts are surprisingly small.
An animated rhombododecahedron (see Fig. 7 of the article).